Writing Tips

Friends to Lovers vs. Second Chance Romance: Why Readers Love (or Hate) These Tropes

When it comes to swoon-worthy romance tropes, few spark as much reader passion (and debate) as friends to lovers and second chance romance. These emotionally charged story arcs tug at the heart in totally different ways, and it’s important to understand why they work in order to write them successfully. 

If you’re more interested in enemies to lovers versus rivals to lovers, click here

Anyway, friends to lovers and second chance romance might seem similar—especially when characters have known each other for a long time—but they hit readers differently. Why? They tap into different desires. Today, we’re breaking down what sets them apart, why readers gravitate to one (and not the other), and how both tropes can create ALL the feels. 

So, what defines each trope?

Friends to lovers is all about evolution. The relationship moves from platonic comfort to romantic revelation. The emotional core is realizing love was right in front of them the whole time. The tension typically comes from fear of ruining a friendship. 

Second chance romance is about reconciliation. The couple has history—often wrought with miscommunication—and the emotional stakes come from revisiting what they lost and why. The characters must confront the past to reclaim their future.

So, why do readers love one and hate the other?

The Pros & Cons of Friends to Lovers:

Pros: It’s emotionally steady. No instalove, no instalust. Just slow-burn (often tender) intimacy. Think cozy feels. Comfort. 

Cons: It can feel too slow or low-stakes if not done well. Readers gravitate toward tension. If there’s not enough conflict, friends to lovers can become boring (and make readers question why they didn’t become lovers in the first place). 

The Pros & Cons of Second Chance Romance:

Pros: The characters show up with tortured chemistry. (Chef’s kiss.) Emotional angst is turned all the way up, and the story dares to ask if love can survive time, mistakes, or even betrayal.

Cons: If the reason they broke up is unforgivable (cheating, for example), readers won’t root for them. At the same time, if the breakup is too easy to reconcile, it can feel like lazy writing. 

At the end of the day, both tropes weigh love and risk. Studying them thoroughly will help you nail it in your own writing. 

Here’s some books to read and take notes on:

Friends to Lovers

  • People We Meet on Vacation by Emily Henry
  • The Raven Boys by Maggie Stiefvater
  • Play With Me by Becka Mack

Second Chance

  • The Ex Hex by Rachel Hawkins
  • Same Time Next Summer by Annabel Monaghan
  • The Ex Vows by Jessica Joyce

I, personally, love a second chance romance if written well (and the initial break up isn’t so awful that I can’t forgive it). I’m not as into friends to lovers. It generally doesn’t feel tense enough for me. (I like drama!) Granted, I think friends to lovers is a fantastic choice for a contemporary young adult novel. Teens are grappling with new feelings, so it naturally elevates this trope. 

Do you love second chance romance or friends to lovers more? What do you think sets them apart? 

Let me know in the comments! 

~SAT


Discover more from Shannon A. Thompson

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Friends to Lovers vs. Second Chance Romance: Why Readers Love (or Hate) These Tropes

  1. I’m actually working on a book that features elements of both! I feel like I enjoy friends to lovers more, but I find myself reading more and more of the second chance books these days.

    Well done article! 🙂

  2. Not typically a romance reader, so excuse my naive question. Does a Second Chance romance have to be by exes reuniting? If one of them was widowed or divorced (from someone else, not their prospective lover) does that count as a Second Chance?

    1. Second Chance Romance does typically mean the couple was together before. If you’re writing about someone who was widowed or divorced finding a second love, that trope is “giving love a second chance.” Slightly different, but also an excellent choice. 🙂

Leave a reply to Shannon A Thompson Cancel reply